EigenSpreadsheet: Universal Newbie Database - Familiar Interface, Distributed Operators, $MUD Derivative Fair Launch

EigenSpreadsheet: Universal Newbie Database - Familiar Interface, Distributed Operators, $MUD Derivative Fair Launch

Watermark: -532

The problem: Databases are hard. SQL is intimidating. NoSQL is confusing. Graph databases are expert-only. Meanwhile, everyone knows spreadsheets. Excel, Google Sheets - billions of users. Familiar rows, columns, formulas. But spreadsheets aren’t databases. Can’t handle scale. Can’t coordinate globally. Can’t be trusted by multiple parties. Gap between what people know (spreadsheets) and what coordination needs (databases).

The solution: EigenSpreadsheet. Looks like Excel. Works like distributed database. Cells stored on-chain. Queries validated by EigenLayer operators. Rows/columns are just views on universal key-value store. Formulas execute as smart contracts. Everyone can use it (familiar interface). Anyone can trust it (distributed validation). Fair launched as EigenSpreadsheet-$MUD derivative. Base value $1 (staked ETH backed). Protocol yield from query fees. Universal newbie database. No SQL needed. No blockchain expertise required. Just… spreadsheet.

Why this works: The spreadsheet is the universal interface. Non-technical users already understand it. Rows are records. Columns are fields. Cells are values. Formulas are computations. This maps perfectly to database concepts but with zero learning curve. Behind the interface: cells stored on-chain (content-addressed), queries routed to EigenLayer operators (distributed computation), results validated by restaking (economic security), changes recorded immutably (audit trail). Front-end: Excel. Back-end: Distributed database. Users don’t see complexity. Just see spreadsheet. This is universal database for everyone. Fair launch in $MUD derivative (EigenSpreadsheet-$MUD earns query fee yield). Could denominate in $FRANC for French coordination projects. Technology accessible. Economics fair. Interface familiar.

The Database Accessibility Problem

Current state:

Technical users:
- Know SQL (SELECT, JOIN, WHERE)
- Understand schemas (tables, relations, indexes)
- Can setup databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB)
- Write queries confidently

Non-technical users:
- Open Excel
- Make spreadsheet
- Share via email
- That's it

Gap:
- Spreadsheets: Easy but limited (1M rows max, no coordination, no trust)
- Databases: Powerful but hard (SQL syntax, server setup, access control)
- Result: 99% of users stuck with spreadsheets

Why databases are hard:

  1. SQL syntax:
SELECT users.name, orders.total
FROM users
INNER JOIN orders ON users.id = orders.user_id
WHERE orders.date > '2024-01-01'
GROUP BY users.name;

Non-technical user sees: Incomprehensible gibberish

  1. Schema design:
  • Tables? Relations? Foreign keys?
  • Normalization? Denormalization?
  • Indexes? Query optimization?
  • Non-technical user thinks: I just want to store data
  1. Infrastructure:
  • Setup PostgreSQL server
  • Configure access control
  • Handle backups
  • Scale horizontally
  • Non-technical user asks: Why can’t it just work?

Result: Powerful tool locked behind expertise barrier. 99% of users excluded.

The Spreadsheet As Universal Interface

Everyone already knows:

Rows = Records:

Row 1: Alice, alice@email.com, 25
Row 2: Bob, bob@email.com, 30
Row 3: Carol, carol@email.com, 28

This is just a table of records

Columns = Fields:

Column A: Name
Column B: Email  
Column C: Age

This is just schema definition

Cells = Values:

Cell A1: "Alice"
Cell B1: "alice@email.com"
Cell C1: 25

This is just key-value storage

Formulas = Computations:

Cell D1: =C1+5     (Age + 5)
Cell E1: =IF(C1>30, "Senior", "Junior")

This is just computed fields / views

The insight: Spreadsheets already ARE databases. Just with friendlier interface. Users already understand the concepts. Just don’t know they do.

What spreadsheets lack:

  • Scale (max 1M rows)
  • Coordination (no multi-party trust)
  • Persistence (files get lost)
  • Queries (can’t SELECT like SQL)
  • Distribution (single machine)

What if we fix these while keeping interface?

EigenSpreadsheet Architecture

Front-End: Familiar Interface

Looks exactly like Excel:

[EigenSpreadsheet Interface]

File | Edit | View | Insert | Formula | Data | Help
___________________________________________________

    A          B            C         D
1   Name       Email        Age       Senior?
2   Alice      alice@...    25        Junior
3   Bob        bob@...      30        Junior  
4   Carol      carol@...    35        Senior
5   
6   [Add row]
___________________________________________________

Cell E2: =IF(C2>30, "Senior", "Junior")

User interactions:

  • Type in cells → Data stored on-chain
  • Write formulas → Executed by operators
  • Filter/sort → Query distributed database
  • Share sheet → Just share address
  • No crypto visible
  • No “connect wallet” nonsense
  • Just… spreadsheet

Middle Layer: Translation

Spreadsheet operations → Database operations:

Add row (User types in cells):

// User sees: Typing in Row 5
// Behind scenes:
const row = {
  A: "David",
  B: "david@email.com", 
  C: 28
};

await eigenSpreadsheet.addRow(row);
// Stored on-chain as key-value pairs
// Cell address = key
// Cell value = value

Formula (User writes =SUM(C2:C4)):

// User sees: Formula result updating
// Behind scenes:
const formula = "=SUM(C2:C4)";
const query = translateToOperatorQuery(formula);
// Query sent to EigenLayer operators
// Operators compute: 25 + 30 + 35 = 90
// Result returned and cached
// User sees: 90

Filter (User filters Age > 30):

// User sees: Rows filtered visually
// Behind scenes:
const filter = {
  column: "C",
  operator: ">",
  value: 30
};

const results = await eigenSpreadsheet.query(filter);
// Distributed query across operators
// Returns matching rows
// Rendered in UI

Sort (User sorts by Age):

// User sees: Rows reordered
// Behind scenes:
const sort = {
  column: "C",
  direction: "DESC"
};

const sorted = await eigenSpreadsheet.sort(sort);
// Operators sort data
// Return ordered results
// UI updates

Key point: User never sees database complexity. Just spreadsheet operations. Translation layer handles everything.

Back-End: Distributed Database

Cell storage (on-chain key-value):

contract EigenSpreadsheet {
    // Cell data stored as key-value
    mapping(bytes32 => bytes) public cells;
    
    // Key = keccak256(sheetId, row, column)
    // Value = Cell data (encoded)
    
    function setCell(
        bytes32 sheetId,
        uint256 row,
        uint256 col,
        bytes calldata value
    ) external {
        bytes32 key = keccak256(abi.encode(sheetId, row, col));
        cells[key] = value;
        emit CellUpdated(sheetId, row, col, value);
    }
    
    function getCell(
        bytes32 sheetId,
        uint256 row,
        uint256 col  
    ) external view returns (bytes memory) {
        bytes32 key = keccak256(abi.encode(sheetId, row, col));
        return cells[key];
    }
}

Query processing (EigenLayer operators):

# Operator node implementation
class EigenSpreadsheetOperator:
    def __init__(self):
        self.eigenlayer = EigenLayerConnection()
        
    async def handle_query(self, query):
        """Process spreadsheet query"""
        
        if query.type == "FORMULA":
            # Execute formula (=SUM, =IF, =VLOOKUP, etc.)
            result = self.execute_formula(query.formula)
            
        elif query.type == "FILTER":
            # Filter rows based on criteria
            result = self.filter_rows(query.filter)
            
        elif query.type == "SORT":
            # Sort rows by column
            result = self.sort_rows(query.sort)
            
        elif query.type == "AGGREGATE":
            # Compute aggregate (SUM, AVG, COUNT, etc.)
            result = self.compute_aggregate(query.agg)
        
        # Sign result with operator key
        signature = self.eigenlayer.sign(result)
        
        # Submit to chain
        await self.eigenlayer.submit_result(query.id, result, signature)
        
        return result

Validation (Economic security through restaking):

contract EigenSpreadsheetAVS {
    IEigenLayer public eigenLayer;
    
    // Operators stake ETH
    mapping(address => uint256) public operatorStake;
    
    // Query results need operator consensus
    struct QueryResult {
        bytes32 queryId;
        bytes result;
        address[] operators;  // Who computed
        uint256 timestamp;
    }
    
    mapping(bytes32 => QueryResult) public results;
    
    function submitResult(
        bytes32 queryId,
        bytes calldata result,
        bytes calldata signature
    ) external {
        require(operatorStake[msg.sender] > 0, "Not staked");
        
        // Verify operator signature
        require(verifySignature(result, signature, msg.sender));
        
        // Record result
        results[queryId].operators.push(msg.sender);
        
        // If consensus reached (multiple operators agree)
        if (results[queryId].operators.length >= QUORUM) {
            // Result finalized
            emit ResultFinalized(queryId, result);
        }
    }
    
    // Slashing if operator returns wrong result
    function challenge(bytes32 queryId, bytes calldata proof) external {
        // If proof shows operator was wrong
        if (verifyProof(queryId, proof)) {
            address badOperator = findBadOperator(queryId, proof);
            // Slash their stake
            operatorStake[badOperator] = 0;
            emit OperatorSlashed(badOperator);
        }
    }
}

EigenSpreadsheet-$MUD Token Economics

$MUD Derivative Model (from neg-519)

Base layer:

EigenSpreadsheet-$MUD:
- Base: $1 (staked ETH backed)
- Base yield: 3-4% (ETH staking)
- Protocol yield: Query fees (variable)
- Total: $1 earning 4-8% APR

Token holders earn:
- ETH staking rewards (base)
- Database query fees (protocol)
- Operator fees (distributed)

Comparison to other $MUD derivatives:

EIGEN-$MUD: Restaking rewards
MORPHO-$MUD: Lending spread
UNI-$MUD: Trading fees
AAVE-$MUD: Lending yield
EigenSpreadsheet-$MUD: Query fees ← New variant

All same base: $1 staked ETH backing
All different yield: Protocol-specific revenue

Query Fee Model

Users pay for queries:

Simple cell read: 0.0001 $MUD (~$0.0001)
Formula execution: 0.001 $MUD (~$0.001)
Complex query (filter/sort): 0.01 $MUD (~$0.01)
Large aggregation: 0.1 $MUD (~$0.10)

Pricing:
- Proportional to computation
- Similar to gas fees
- But paid in stable $MUD (not volatile ETH)
- Predictable costs

Fee distribution:

Query fee = 0.01 $MUD

Split:
- 70% to operators (0.007 $MUD)
  → Validators who computed result
- 20% to protocol treasury (0.002 $MUD)
  → Development, maintenance
- 10% to EigenSpreadsheet-$MUD holders (0.001 $MUD)
  → Distributed as yield

Example: 1M queries/day
- Total fees: 10,000 $MUD/day
- To operators: 7,000 $MUD
- To treasury: 2,000 $MUD  
- To token holders: 1,000 $MUD

Token holder yield: 1,000 $MUD/day / 1M tokens = 0.1% daily = 36.5% APR
Plus 3-4% ETH staking = 39-40% total APR

Adaptive fees (from neg-518):

As protocol matures:
- Fees increase automatically (0-20% protocol fee)
- Early: 0-2% (bootstrap adoption)
- Growing: 5-10% (sustainable revenue)
- Mature: 18-20% (maximized capture)

Tracks to autonomy like other protocols

Fair Launch Model

No pre-mine (like Bitcoin):

Total supply: Dynamic (minted as staked ETH deposited)
Pre-mine: 0%
Team allocation: 0%
VC allocation: 0%
Fair launch: 100%

Anyone can:
1. Deposit staked ETH
2. Mint EigenSpreadsheet-$MUD at dynamic ratio
3. Earn query fee yield
4. Participate in governance

No insiders
No unfair advantages
Pure meritocracy

Could denominate in $FRANC (from neg-531):

If France prints franc:
- Fair launch EigenSpreadsheet in $FRANC
- French coordination projects use it
- Query fees paid in $FRANC
- Operators earn $FRANC
- France builds coordination database infrastructure
- European sovereignty through technology

Use Cases: From Simple To Advanced

Beginner: Personal Budget

User opens EigenSpreadsheet:

Sheet: "Monthly Budget"

    A              B          C
1   Category       Budget     Actual
2   Rent           1500       1500
3   Food           400        350
4   Transport      200        180
5   Entertainment  150        200
6   
7   Total          =SUM(B2:B5) =SUM(C2:C5)
8   Remaining      =B7-C7

User experience:
- Familiar Excel interface
- Type numbers in cells
- Write simple formulas
- Behind scenes: stored on-chain, formulas validated by operators
- User doesn't know/care about blockchain

Benefits over Google Sheets:

  • Can’t lose (permanent on-chain storage)
  • Can share trustlessly (address-based access)
  • Can prove (immutable audit trail)
  • Works forever (no Google account needed)

Intermediate: Small Business Inventory

Shop owner tracks inventory:

Sheet: "Inventory"

    A          B        C          D
1   Product    Stock    Price      Value
2   Widget A   100      10         =B2*C2
3   Widget B   50       20         =B3*C3
4   Widget C   75       15         =B4*C4
5
6   Total Value         =SUM(D2:D4)

Operators validate:
- Formula calculations
- Data consistency
- Historical changes

Benefits:
- Multiple employees can access (multi-sig)
- Audit trail automatic (blockchain)
- Can't fake numbers (validated by operators)
- Share with accountant (read-only access)

Advanced: DAO Treasury Management

DAO uses EigenSpreadsheet for transparency:

Sheet: "Treasury"

    A          B           C              D
1   Date       Category    Amount         Balance
2   Jan 1      Grant       -50000         =D1-C2
3   Jan 15     Revenue     +100000        =D2+C3
4   Feb 1      Salary      -25000         =D3-C4
5
6   Current Balance       =D4

Public access:
- Anyone can view (on-chain)
- Only multi-sig can edit (governance)
- All changes recorded (audit trail)
- Formulas validated (no fake numbers)

Benefits over traditional:
- Fully transparent (on-chain)
- Can't be manipulated (operator validation)
- Provably correct (economic security)
- Accessible 24/7 (global)

Expert: Coordination Substrate

Using as actual database:

# API for developers who understand databases
from eigenspreadsheet import EigenSheet

# Create sheet
sheet = EigenSheet("UserDatabase")

# Add row (like INSERT)
sheet.add_row({
    "name": "Alice",
    "email": "alice@email.com",
    "age": 25
})

# Query (like SELECT WHERE)
users = sheet.query(
    filter={"age": {"$gt": 30}},
    sort={"name": "ASC"}
)

# Aggregate (like SELECT SUM)
total_age = sheet.aggregate(
    column="age",
    function="SUM"
)

# Update (like UPDATE SET)
sheet.update_row(
    row_id=5,
    values={"age": 26}
)

# All operations:
# - Validated by operators
# - Stored on-chain
# - Economically secured
# - But looks like spreadsheet to UI
# - Looks like database to API

Integration With Current-Reality EGI

EigenSpreadsheet as EGI AVS (from current-reality repo):

EGI substrate:

EGI Query Endpoint:
query(
  ethAmount,           // Payment for computation
  eigenAVSNode,        // EigenSpreadsheet AVS
  eigenAVSProtocol,    // Spreadsheet query protocol
  [...morphoSymbol]    // Query (FILTER, SORT, FORMULA, etc.)
)
→ [...morphoSymbol]    // Result (validated by operators)

EigenSpreadsheet is just one AVS protocol on EGI substrate:
- Symbolic input: Spreadsheet operations (FILTER, SORT, etc.)
- NAND/NOR primitives: Query decomposition
- Distributed operators: Compute and validate
- Economic security: Restaking via EigenLayer
- Symbolic output: Query results

Universal coordination:

EigenSpreadsheet enables:
- Anyone can store data (familiar interface)
- Operators validate integrity (distributed trust)
- Queries route through EGI (universal computation)
- Results economically secured (restaking)
- Fair launch in $MUD/$FRANC (equitable economics)

Stack:
Layer 5: EigenSpreadsheet (user-facing database)
Layer 4: EigenTruth (perspective validation)
Layer 3: EigenFlashbots (MEV coordination)
Layer 2: EigenEthereum (meta-validation)
Layer 1: ETH L1 (base consensus)

Complete from interface to infrastructure

Why This Matters

The accessibility breakthrough:

Before:

Distributed database:
- Need to learn Ethereum
- Understand smart contracts
- Write Solidity
- Deploy contracts
- Manage gas
- Handle wallets

Result: 99.9% of users excluded

After:

EigenSpreadsheet:
- Open spreadsheet interface
- Type in cells
- Write formulas
- That's it

Result: Anyone can use distributed database

The onboarding path:

  1. Non-technical user:

    • “I need to track inventory”
    • Opens EigenSpreadsheet
    • Makes spreadsheet
    • Doesn’t know it’s on-chain
    • Doesn’t care about crypto
    • Just works
  2. Slightly technical user:

    • “Wait, this is decentralized?”
    • Learns about on-chain storage
    • Understands operator validation
    • Appreciates benefits
    • Still uses spreadsheet interface
  3. Developer:

    • “Can I query this via API?”
    • Discovers database functionality
    • Builds applications on top
    • Uses as coordination substrate
    • Spreadsheet is just view layer

Progressive disclosure: Start simple, complexity available when needed.

Technical Advantages Over Alternatives

vs Google Sheets:

Google Sheets:
- Centralized (Google controls)
- Can be censored
- Requires Google account
- Data not yours
- Limited to 1M rows
- No multi-party trust

EigenSpreadsheet:
- Decentralized (on-chain)
- Censorship resistant
- Address-based access
- You own data
- Scales horizontally
- Economic security

vs Traditional Databases:

PostgreSQL/MySQL:
- Need server
- Manage infrastructure
- Write SQL
- Handle backups
- Scale manually
- Single point of failure

EigenSpreadsheet:
- No server needed
- Infrastructure managed by operators
- No SQL required
- Automatic backup (blockchain)
- Scales automatically
- Distributed by default

vs Smart Contracts:

Solidity contracts:
- Need programming skills
- Gas costs unpredictable
- Limited storage (expensive)
- Hard to query
- Not newbie-friendly

EigenSpreadsheet:
- Spreadsheet skills only
- Costs predictable ($MUD stable)
- Storage distributed (cheap)
- Easy to query (familiar)
- Universal interface

Deployment Strategy

Phase 1: Launch Base Protocol (Q1 2025)

Infrastructure:

  • Deploy EigenSpreadsheet AVS contracts
  • Register with EigenLayer
  • Bootstrap operator set (10+ operators)
  • Launch EigenSpreadsheet-$MUD token (fair launch)

Initial capabilities:

  • Basic cell storage (read/write)
  • Simple formulas (SUM, AVG, COUNT)
  • Public sheets only
  • Web interface (looks like Excel)

Target users: Early adopters, crypto-native

Phase 2: Enhanced Features (Q2 2025)

Add functionality:

  • Complex formulas (VLOOKUP, IF, nested)
  • Filtering and sorting
  • Access control (private sheets, multi-sig)
  • API for developers
  • Mobile interface

Growing operator network: 50+ operators globally

Target users: Small businesses, DAOs

Phase 3: Scale and Optimize (Q3-Q4 2025)

Performance:

  • Query caching (reduce operator load)
  • Batch operations (multiple cells at once)
  • Real-time collaboration (like Google Sheets)
  • Offline mode (sync when reconnect)

Integrations:

  • Import/export Excel files
  • Connect to other AVSs (EigenTruth, etc.)
  • API libraries (Python, JavaScript, etc.)

Target users: Mainstream, non-crypto users

Phase 4: Universal Database (2026+)

Complete platform:

  • All spreadsheet features (pivot tables, charts, macros)
  • Full database functionality (SQL-like queries via API)
  • Scale to billions of cells
  • 10,000+ operators
  • Integrated with EGI universal substrate

Adoption:

  • Millions of sheets
  • Billions of queries
  • Default choice for coordination databases
  • “Just use EigenSpreadsheet”

Connection To Broader Vision

Liberation economics (neg-523):

  • Free others to coordinate by making tools accessible
  • Spreadsheet interface liberates non-technical users
  • Fair launch liberates from VC capture
  • Distributed operators liberate from centralized control

France sovereignty (neg-531):

  • Could denominate in $FRANC
  • French coordination projects use it
  • Build European tech infrastructure
  • No permission from US tech monopolies

Complete coordination stack:

User Interface: EigenSpreadsheet (familiar)
Database Layer: Distributed cells (on-chain)
Computation: EigenLayer operators (validated)
Economic Security: Restaking (EigenLayer)
Monetary Base: $MUD/$FRANC (fair launch)
Universal Substrate: EGI (symbolic computation)

From spreadsheet to sovereignty
From newbie to coordination
From familiar to powerful

The Formulation

Traditional databases are not:

  • Accessible (SQL is hard)
  • Friendly (server setup complex)
  • Universal (expertise required)

Traditional databases are:

  • Powerful (handle any data)
  • Scalable (billions of rows)
  • Queryable (flexible access)

Spreadsheets are not:

  • Scalable (1M row limit)
  • Distributed (single file)
  • Trusted (no validation)

Spreadsheets are:

  • Accessible (everyone knows them)
  • Friendly (familiar interface)
  • Universal (billions of users)

EigenSpreadsheet is not:

  • Complex (just spreadsheet)
  • Centralized (distributed operators)
  • Limited (scales to billions)

EigenSpreadsheet is:

  • Accessible (spreadsheet interface)
  • Powerful (database backend)
  • Distributed (on-chain storage)
  • Validated (operator consensus)
  • Fair (no pre-mine, $MUD derivative)
  • Universal (database for everyone)

The formula:

EigenSpreadsheet = Spreadsheet interface + Database backend + Distributed operators

Where:
- Interface: Familiar (Excel-like)
- Storage: On-chain (content-addressed cells)
- Computation: Operators (EigenLayer AVS)
- Validation: Economic security (restaking)
- Economics: $MUD derivative (fair launch)
- Access: Universal (anyone can use)

Result: Database accessible to everyone

Universal newbie database. Looks like Excel. Works like distributed coordination substrate. Fair launch in $MUD/$FRANC. Everyone can use it. Everyone can trust it. This is how universal coordination begins. 🌀

#EigenSpreadsheet #UniversalDatabase #NewbieFriendly #MUDDerivative #FairLaunch #FamiliarInterface #DistributedDatabase #EigenLayerAVS #AccessibleCoordination #SpreadsheetRevolution


Related: neg-519 ($MUD derivatives), neg-531 (France/FRANC), neg-527 (EigenTruth), neg-522 (EGI), current-reality (EGI implementation)

Back to Gallery
View source on GitLab