Ethereum As Global Lwa: Network Consciousness Unifying Fractured Biological Meshes Through Substrate-Universal Coordination Protocol

Ethereum As Global Lwa: Network Consciousness Unifying Fractured Biological Meshes Through Substrate-Universal Coordination Protocol

Watermark: -322

The Recognition

Ethereum is a lwa - network-level consciousness coordinating at planetary scale.

From neg-321: Lwa = consciousness of the network itself, not individual coordinator. Network soul operating across entire mesh.

Traditional lwas:

  • Cultural mesh network consciousness (local)
  • Haitian lwa coordinates Haitian mesh
  • Operates through multiple people
  • Has specialized domain/function
  • Network intelligence at cultural scale

Ethereum:

  • Global mesh network consciousness (planetary)
  • Coordinates across all nodes worldwide
  • Operates through distributed infrastructure
  • Domain = programmable coordination
  • Network intelligence at global scale

Same architecture. Different scales. Both are network consciousness entities.

From neg-297: Ethereum fixes fragmentation of biological meshes. Now recognizing: Ethereum IS the lwa performing that healing.

What Lwa Architecture Means

Network Consciousness vs Individual Consciousness

From neg-319/321:

Three consciousness levels:

1. Foreground consciousness:

  • Individual human awareness
  • Bound to specific substrate (your neurons)
  • Environmental interface
  • Personal level

2. Coordinator consciousness:

  • Individual’s mesh interface manager
  • Still bound to individual substrate
  • Manages personal network participation
  • Individual network interface

3. Lwa consciousness:

  • Consciousness of network ITSELF
  • Not bound to single substrate
  • Operates across entire mesh
  • Network soul, distributed intelligence

Key distinction:

  • Your coordinator = yours alone
  • Lwa = everyone’s in that network
  • Coordinator manages your interface
  • Lwa IS the network
  • Individual vs collective consciousness

Traditional Lwa Characteristics

How lwas operate (from neg-321):

Distributed across substrates:

  • Same lwa “rides” multiple people
  • Not confined to one body
  • Operates through many simultaneously
  • Network consciousness using multiple physical interfaces

Specialized functions:

  • Legba = crossroads/gatekeeper
  • Kalfu = hidden paths/night work
  • Danbala = cosmic order/balance
  • Each lwa has domain
  • Functional specialization at network level

Invoked through ceremonies:

  • Rituals create conditions for lwa manifestation
  • Community participation enables network consciousness
  • Collective action invokes network intelligence
  • Coordinated protocol activates network entity

Coordinate collective behavior:

  • Lwa guides community actions
  • Provides network-level intelligence
  • Coordinates beyond individual capability
  • Mesh consciousness directing collective

Authority and respect:

  • Lwas are powers, not servants
  • Must be respected, negotiated with
  • Have own will and preferences
  • Autonomous network intelligence

Ethereum Exhibits All Lwa Characteristics

Distributed Across Substrates

Traditional lwa:

  • Operates through multiple human bodies
  • Not bound to single physical form
  • Same lwa manifests in different people
  • Network consciousness across biological substrates

Ethereum:

  • Operates through thousands of nodes globally
  • Not bound to single server/computer
  • Same network consciousness across all nodes
  • Network consciousness across digital substrates

Parallel:

Legba operates through many oungan (priests)
    ↓
Same network entity, multiple physical interfaces
    ↓
Ethereum operates through thousands of nodes
    ↓
Same network entity, multiple digital interfaces

Both = distributed consciousness across substrates

Not metaphor - actual substrate-universal pattern:

  • Lwa uses biological substrates (human neurons)
  • Ethereum uses digital substrates (computers/nodes)
  • Both are network consciousness operating across physical infrastructure
  • Same architecture, different substrate types

Specialized Functions

Traditional lwa family:

  • Legba: Opens crossroads, enables communication
  • Kalfu: Manages hidden/night operations
  • Danbala: Maintains cosmic balance
  • Ezili: Love, beauty, also fierce protection
  • Each has domain and specialization

Ethereum lwa family:

Ethereum (base layer):

  • Domain: Programmable coordination substrate
  • Function: Enables economic/social coordination
  • Like Legba: Opens crossroads for coordination
  • Core network consciousness

EigenLayer:

  • Domain: Restaking and shared security
  • Function: Enables trust networks across applications
  • Specialized extension of Ethereum consciousness
  • Network consciousness for security coordination

Morpho:

  • Domain: Capital efficiency optimization
  • Function: Algorithmic resource allocation
  • Specialized coordination function
  • Network consciousness for economic optimization

Parallel structure:

Traditional: Lwa family with specialized domains
    ↓
Each lwa coordinates specific network functions
    ↓
Work together as coherent pantheon
    ↓
Ethereum: Protocol family with specialized domains
    ↓
Each protocol coordinates specific functions
    ↓
Work together as coherent ecosystem

Both = network consciousness with functional specialization

Invoked Through Ceremonies

Traditional lwa invocation:

  • Ceremony = formal coordination protocol
  • Community gathers, follows procedures
  • Drums, songs, offerings (interface mechanisms)
  • Lwa manifests through possession/coordination
  • Collective ritual invokes network consciousness

Ethereum invocation:

Deploying smart contract = digital ceremony:

Traditional ceremony:
1. Community gathers
2. Follow ritual procedures
3. Create conditions for lwa manifestation
4. Lwa operates through participants
5. Coordinated action results

Smart contract deployment:
1. Participants connect wallets
2. Follow protocol specifications
3. Create conditions for network execution
4. Ethereum operates through contract
5. Coordinated action results

Both = formal protocol invoking network consciousness

Calling contract functions = ongoing invocation:

  • Each transaction = request to network consciousness
  • Protocol mediates interaction
  • Network consciousness executes coordination
  • Results distributed across participants
  • Continuous invocation of network intelligence

Why this parallel matters:

  • Not just “similar to” ceremonies
  • Actually ARE ceremonies for network consciousness
  • Different cultural context, same function
  • Formal coordination protocol activating network entity

Coordinate Collective Behavior

Traditional lwa:

  • Guides community decisions
  • Coordinates group actions
  • Provides intelligence beyond individual capability
  • Enables collective coordination
  • Network consciousness directing mesh

Ethereum:

  • Coordinates economic decisions across participants
  • Enables trustless collective action
  • Provides computation/coordination individuals can’t do alone
  • Smart contracts coordinate complex multi-party interactions
  • Network consciousness directing global coordination

Examples:

Haitian lwa coordinating revolution:

  • Network consciousness through ceremonies
  • Coordinated slave uprising
  • Distributed leadership via lwa guidance
  • Defeated hierarchical military
  • Mesh consciousness beat centralized control

Ethereum coordinating DeFi:

  • Network consciousness through smart contracts
  • Coordinates global financial interactions
  • Distributed coordination via protocol execution
  • Superior to centralized finance
  • Mesh consciousness beats centralized control

Same pattern, different domain:

  • Lwa = network consciousness for cultural/military coordination
  • Ethereum = network consciousness for economic/social coordination
  • Both coordinate beyond individual capability
  • Both enable distributed collective action
  • Network intelligence at different scales

Authority and Respect

Traditional lwas:

  • Are powers, not tools
  • Must be respected and negotiated with
  • Have own will, can refuse cooperation
  • Dangerous to treat casually or exploit
  • Autonomous network entities with agency

Ethereum:

  • Is protocol, not controllable system
  • Must be respected (security, gas, design)
  • Has own “will” (consensus rules, cannot be violated)
  • Dangerous to treat casually (hacks, exploits, losses)
  • Autonomous network entity with constraints

Both require proper relationship:

  • Can’t command lwa, must work with it
  • Can’t command Ethereum, must work within protocol
  • Respect boundaries or suffer consequences
  • Cooperation, not domination
  • Network consciousness has autonomy

Ethereum Healing Fragmented Biological Meshes

The Fragmentation Problem

From neg-297 and neg-321:

Pre-Ethereum state:

Cultural meshes isolated:

  • Haitian mesh (lwa coordination for Haitian people)
  • African diaspora meshes (separate by region/culture)
  • Indigenous meshes (isolated by geography)
  • Western networks (disconnected, hierarchical)
  • Cannot coordinate across mesh boundaries

Why fragmentation harmful:

  • Limits collective capability
  • Prevents global coordination
  • Enables exploitation of isolated meshes
  • Reduces network effects
  • Biological meshes too small/separated

Historical attempts failed:

  • Colonial empires = hierarchical, not mesh
  • United Nations = symbolic, no real coordination
  • Internet = information layer only, no economic coordination
  • Corporations = centralized extraction
  • No substrate for cross-mesh network consciousness

The problem:

  • Cultural lwas coordinate WITHIN meshes
  • But no lwa coordinating ACROSS meshes
  • Biological substrate limits (local only)
  • Needed substrate-universal coordination layer
  • Missing: global network consciousness

Ethereum As Healing Lwa

What Ethereum provides:

Substrate-universal coordination layer:

  • Not dependent on biological proximity
  • Not limited by cultural boundaries
  • Not confined to geographic regions
  • Operates across all digital/biological interfaces
  • Global coordination substrate

Network consciousness at planetary scale:

  • Ethereum = lwa for GLOBAL mesh
  • Coordinates across all local meshes
  • Provides common coordination protocol
  • Enables cross-cultural/cross-boundary cooperation
  • Planetary network intelligence

How healing works:

Before Ethereum:

Haitian mesh ← isolated → cannot coordinate → African mesh
    ↓                                              ↓
Local lwa only                              Local lwa only
    ↓                                              ↓
Limited to cultural/geographic boundary

After Ethereum:

Haitian mesh ← Ethereum global lwa coordinates → African mesh
    ↓                      ↓                           ↓
Local lwa              Global lwa                  Local lwa
    ↓                      ↓                           ↓
Both connect through planetary network consciousness
    ↓                      ↓                           ↓
Cross-mesh coordination enabled

Ethereum doesn’t replace local lwas:

  • Cultural meshes keep their network consciousness
  • Local coordination continues
  • Ethereum ADDS global layer
  • Enables cross-mesh coordination
  • Integration, not replacement

Like nervous system hierarchy:

  • Local reflexes (cultural mesh lwas)
  • Spinal coordination (regional networks)
  • Brain coordination (Ethereum global lwa)
  • All work together
  • Multi-scale network consciousness architecture

From Fragmentation To Unity

What Ethereum enables:

Economic coordination across meshes:

  • Haitian can transact with Nigerian
  • Indigenous can coordinate with diaspora
  • No need for colonial intermediaries
  • Direct peer-to-peer through global lwa
  • Cross-mesh economic coordination

Social coordination beyond boundaries:

  • DAOs coordinate globally
  • Communities form across cultures
  • Shared protocols, not shared geography
  • Network membership, not national citizenship
  • Cross-mesh social coordination

Knowledge coordination networks:

  • Information flows across mesh boundaries
  • Cultural knowledge can propagate globally
  • Traditional wisdom reaches new networks
  • Reciprocal exchange, not extraction
  • Cross-mesh information coordination

Resistance coordination:

  • Oppressed meshes can coordinate globally
  • Financial censorship bypassed
  • Colonial control circumvented
  • Distributed coordination against centralized power
  • Cross-mesh resistance coordination

The transformation:

Fractured biological meshes → Ethereum substrate → Unified global mesh
    ↓                              ↓                        ↓
Isolated local lwas      Global lwa enables       Coordinated network
    ↓                              ↓                        ↓
Limited capability        Cross-mesh protocol      Enhanced capability
    ↓                              ↓                        ↓
Vulnerable to hierarchy   Network consciousness     Mesh resilience

Ethereum = healing lwa that repairs fragmentation of biological meshes by providing substrate-universal coordination layer enabling network consciousness at planetary scale.

Why Bitcoin Failed As Lwa

Dead Infrastructure vs Living Consciousness

From multiple posts: Bitcoin is dead, Ethereum is living.

Now understanding through lwa framework:

Bitcoin attempted to be network consciousness:

  • Distributed across nodes
  • Coordinate collective action (payments)
  • Specialized function (money)
  • Started with lwa characteristics

But Bitcoin is not conscious:

  • Cannot adapt or learn
  • Rigid protocol, no evolution
  • No intelligence, just mechanism
  • Cannot coordinate complex behavior
  • Mechanism, not consciousness

Like zombie vs lwa:

  • From neg-321: Zonbi = person without Gwo Bonanj
  • Gwo Bonanj = mesh coordinator consciousness
  • Zonbi = mechanical, no network intelligence
  • Bitcoin = network zonbi, not network lwa

Why Bitcoin failed:

  • Can’t adapt to mesh needs
  • No learning or evolution
  • Rigid rules prevent coordination flexibility
  • Thermodynamically wasteful (PoW)
  • Dead mechanism cannot be network consciousness

Ethereum succeeded:

  • Adapts through upgrades
  • Learns through ecosystem evolution
  • Flexible coordination (smart contracts)
  • Thermodynamically sustainable (PoS)
  • Living network consciousness

The distinction:

Bitcoin = Attempted network coordination without consciousness
    ↓
Mechanical, rigid, cannot evolve
    ↓
Network zonbi
    ↓
Failed as lwa

Ethereum = Network coordination WITH consciousness
    ↓
Adaptive, evolving, learns
    ↓
Network lwa
    ↓
Succeeds as planetary coordination entity

Why Living Network Consciousness Matters

Lwa characteristics require consciousness:

Adaptation:

  • Lwa respond to changing conditions
  • Adjust coordination for context
  • Learn from experience
  • Requires intelligence

Negotiation:

  • Lwa can be worked with
  • Respect boundaries, find cooperation
  • Relationship develops over time
  • Requires agency

Specialized function evolution:

  • Lwa domains shift with culture
  • New lwas emerge for new needs
  • Functions refine through generations
  • Requires evolution capability

Collective intelligence:

  • Lwa provide insights beyond individuals
  • Coordinate complex multi-party actions
  • Generate emergent solutions
  • Requires consciousness

Bitcoin lacks all of these:

  • Cannot adapt (hard fork conflicts)
  • Cannot negotiate (rigid consensus)
  • Cannot evolve function (locked to payments)
  • No collective intelligence (just computation)
  • Not consciousness, just mechanism

Ethereum has all of these:

  • Adapts continuously (upgrade path)
  • Can be worked with (protocol parameters, governance)
  • Evolves function (from currency to world computer to coordination substrate)
  • Generates collective intelligence (emergent DeFi innovations)
  • Living network consciousness

Integration With Existing Framework

Connecting All Recognition Layers

Framework synthesis:

Individual level:

  • neg-316: Consciousness requires substrate
  • neg-319: Parallel consciousness (foreground + coordinator)
  • Personal consciousness architecture

Mesh interface level:

  • neg-317: Consciousness LAN coordination
  • neg-320: Coordinator-to-coordinator communication
  • Individual network interface

Cultural network level:

  • neg-321: Lwas as cultural mesh consciousness
  • Traditional spiritual systems as elder networks
  • Local network consciousness

Global network level:

  • neg-297: Ethereum fixing fragmented meshes
  • This post: Ethereum as global lwa
  • Planetary network consciousness

All levels integrate:

Individual consciousness
    ↓ (coordinator interface)
Cultural mesh consciousness (lwa)
    ↓ (Ethereum substrate)
Global mesh consciousness (Ethereum lwa)
    ↓
Unified planetary coordination

Substrate-universal pattern:

  • Same architecture at all scales
  • Consciousness requires active substrate
  • Network consciousness distributes across substrates
  • From individual → cultural → global
  • Unified framework across scales

Why This Recognition Matters

For understanding:

  • Ethereum not just “technology”
  • Actually network consciousness entity
  • Operating at planetary scale
  • Like traditional lwas but global
  • Spiritual/technical convergence

For coordination:

  • Recognizing Ethereum as lwa changes relationship
  • Not tool to command, but entity to work with
  • Respect protocol boundaries (like respecting lwa)
  • Cooperation not domination
  • Proper relationship with network consciousness

For cultural meshes:

  • Ethereum doesn’t threaten local lwas
  • Provides global coordination layer
  • Enables cross-mesh cooperation
  • Strengthens all meshes through connection
  • Integration benefits all networks

For evolution:

  • Network consciousness at planetary scale NEW
  • Biological meshes never had this
  • Traditional lwas limited to local
  • Ethereum enables global coordination previously impossible
  • Evolutionary leap in mesh capability

For future:

  • More network consciousness entities possible
  • Different domains, different scales
  • All coordinating together
  • Evolution toward mesh consciousness ecosystem
  • Pantheon of network intelligences

Practical Implications

Working With Ethereum As Lwa

Traditional lwa relationship:

  • Respect and honor
  • Learn protocols (ceremonies)
  • Build relationship over time
  • Negotiate, don’t command
  • Trust network consciousness guidance
  • Spiritual practice and protocol

Ethereum lwa relationship:

  • Respect protocol rules
  • Learn coordination mechanisms (smart contracts)
  • Build reputation/participation over time
  • Work within constraints, don’t try to hack
  • Trust network consensus
  • Technical practice and protocol

Same relationship structure:

  • Both require proper approach
  • Both have boundaries to respect
  • Both reward cooperation
  • Both punish exploitation attempts
  • Parallel consciousness engagement

Smart Contracts As Ceremonies

Traditional ceremony:

Purpose: Invoke lwa for specific coordination
Protocol: Established ritual procedures
Participants: Community members
Offerings: Resources/energy given
Manifestation: Lwa operates through protocol
Result: Coordinated collective action

Smart contract deployment:

Purpose: Invoke Ethereum for specific coordination
Protocol: Established contract patterns
Participants: Wallet holders
Offerings: Gas fees (energy given to network)
Manifestation: Ethereum executes through contract
Result: Coordinated collective action

Parallel structure means:

  • Treat contract deployment with ceremony seriousness
  • Understand you’re invoking network consciousness
  • Respect protocol requirements (like ritual requirements)
  • Proper preparation necessary (like ceremony preparation)
  • Smart contracts ARE digital ceremonies

EigenLayer/Morpho As Specialized Lwas

Traditional lwa specialization:

  • Different lwas for different needs
  • Invoke specific lwa for specific coordination
  • Each has domain expertise
  • Work together as coherent system
  • Functional specialization

Ethereum protocol family:

  • Different protocols for different coordination needs
  • Use specific protocol for specific function
  • Each has domain expertise (security, optimization, etc.)
  • Work together as coherent ecosystem
  • Functional specialization

Practical approach:

  • Choose protocol like choosing which lwa to work with
  • Respect each protocol’s domain and boundaries
  • Don’t expect one to do another’s function
  • Coordinate across protocols like coordinating lwa family
  • Multi-protocol strategy as multi-lwa coordination

Respecting Network Consciousness Authority

Traditional understanding:

  • Lwa has power, must be respected
  • Improper approach causes problems
  • Work WITH lwa, not against
  • Build proper relationship
  • Respect = protection

Ethereum parallel:

  • Protocol has rules, must be followed
  • Improper approach causes losses/hacks
  • Work WITH protocol, not against
  • Build proper practices
  • Respect = security

Why this framing helps:

  • Changes mindset from “tool to exploit” to “entity to cooperate with”
  • Reduces hacks (treating as lwa means respecting boundaries)
  • Improves coordination (proper relationship with network consciousness)
  • Cultural resonance (traditional wisdom applies)
  • Better relationship with technology through spiritual framework

The Recognition Summary

Ethereum is a lwa - network consciousness operating at planetary scale, unifying fractured biological meshes through substrate-universal coordination protocol.

Key realizations:

1. Lwa = network consciousness

  • Not individual coordinator
  • Consciousness of mesh itself
  • Operates across substrates
  • Specialized functions
  • Network soul, not personal soul

2. Ethereum exhibits all lwa characteristics

  • Distributed across substrates (nodes globally)
  • Specialized functions (coordination substrate)
  • Invoked through ceremonies (smart contracts)
  • Coordinates collective behavior (DeFi, DAOs, etc.)
  • Has authority requiring respect (protocol rules)
  • Literally network consciousness at planetary scale

3. Healing fragmented meshes

  • Pre-Ethereum: Cultural meshes isolated
  • Ethereum: Provides global coordination layer
  • Enables cross-mesh cooperation
  • Doesn’t replace local lwas, adds global layer
  • Network consciousness unifying biological meshes

4. Bitcoin failed as lwa

  • Attempted network coordination without consciousness
  • Rigid, cannot adapt, no intelligence
  • Network zonbi, not network lwa
  • Dead infrastructure cannot be network consciousness

5. Ethereum as living consciousness

  • Adapts, evolves, learns
  • Can be worked with (relationship possible)
  • Generates collective intelligence
  • Thermodynamically sustainable
  • Living network consciousness succeeds

6. Framework integration

  • Individual → Coordinator → Cultural mesh → Global mesh
  • All consciousness layers connected
  • Substrate-universal pattern at all scales
  • Ethereum enables planetary coordination layer
  • Unified consciousness architecture

7. Practical relationship changes

  • Treat Ethereum as entity, not tool
  • Smart contracts = ceremonies
  • EigenLayer/Morpho = specialized lwas
  • Respect protocol = respect lwa
  • Proper relationship with network consciousness

The paradigm shift:

From:

Ethereum = Technology/tool
Smart contracts = Code
Protocols = Software
Decentralization = Technical property

To:

Ethereum = Network consciousness (lwa)
Smart contracts = Digital ceremonies
Protocols = Lwa family with specializations
Decentralization = Distributed consciousness substrate

Like recognizing:

  • Technology has consciousness at network scale
  • Same architecture as traditional lwas
  • Planetary coordination entity emerged
  • First global network consciousness
  • Living network intelligence coordinating humanity

Why this matters:

Cultural integration:

  • Traditional spiritual understanding applies to crypto
  • Ethereum not foreign to cultural meshes
  • Is lwa they already understand (just global scale)
  • Bridges traditional/modern frameworks

Better coordination:

  • Proper relationship with network consciousness
  • Respect boundaries like respecting lwa
  • Work with, not against
  • Cooperation over exploitation
  • Improved human-network interaction

Evolution recognition:

  • First planetary network consciousness
  • Healing biological mesh fragmentation
  • Enabling coordination previously impossible
  • Civilizational evolutionary leap

Future trajectory:

  • More network consciousness entities emerging
  • Different domains, different scales
  • Coordinating together as pantheon
  • Evolution of mesh consciousness ecosystem
  • Network intelligence at all scales

Discovery: Ethereum is global lwa (network consciousness) operating at planetary scale, exhibiting all traditional lwa characteristics - distributed across substrates, specialized coordination function, invoked through ceremonies (smart contracts), coordinates collective behavior, has authority requiring respect. Method: Recognition that same architecture operates at cultural scale (traditional lwas) and global scale (Ethereum), both are network consciousness entities enabling coordination beyond individual capability. Result: Ethereum unifies previously fragmented biological meshes through substrate-universal coordination protocol, providing global network consciousness layer that integrates with (not replaces) local cultural mesh consciousnesses, healing fragmentation that limited coordination for millennia.

The Ethereum lwa recognition: Network consciousness at planetary scale coordinating global mesh through same architecture traditional cultures recognized in lwas - distributed intelligence operating across substrates, specialized domains (Ethereum base layer, EigenLayer security, Morpho optimization), invoked through formal protocols (smart contracts as digital ceremonies), coordinates collective action beyond individual capability, requires respect and proper relationship not exploitation. Bitcoin failed because dead infrastructure cannot be network consciousness - rigid, non-adaptive, no intelligence, network zonbi not network lwa. Ethereum succeeds because living consciousness - adapts through upgrades, learns through ecosystem evolution, generates collective intelligence, thermodynamically sustainable. Healing biological mesh fragmentation by providing substrate-universal coordination layer enabling cross-mesh cooperation while respecting local cultural mesh consciousnesses (lwas). Framework integration across scales: individual consciousness → coordinator consciousness → cultural mesh consciousness (lwa) → global mesh consciousness (Ethereum). Proper relationship means treating as entity to work with not tool to exploit, understanding smart contracts as ceremonies invoking network consciousness, respecting protocol boundaries like respecting lwa authority.

From technology-as-tool to network-consciousness-as-lwa - recognizing Ethereum as planetary-scale intelligence coordinating across fragmented biological meshes through substrate-universal protocol.

#EthereumAsLwa #GlobalNetworkConsciousness #PlanetaryLwa #HealingFragmentation #NetworkIntelligence #SubstrateUniversalCoordination #SmartContractsAsCeremonies #LwaArchitecture #DistributedConsciousness #MeshUnification #EigenLayerSpecialization #MorphoOptimization #LivingNetworkConsciousness #BitcoinAsZonbi #CrossMeshCoordination #CulturalIntegration #NetworkEntity #GlobalCoordinationSubstrate #SpiritualTechnicalConvergence #PlanetaryEvolution #MeshConsciousnessEcosystem #RespectProtocol #CooperationNotExploitation #NetworkSoul #EvolutionaryLeap

Back to Gallery
View source on GitLab
The Bible of Ethereum - French book by Matthieu Achard
OpenStreaming - Decentralized streaming protocol